What should an author do if they realize there is an error in their research results after the research article is published?

Authors should notify us as soon as possible if they find errors in their published article, especially errors that could affect the interpretation of data or reliability of information presented.

Can you remove an author from a paper?

It is unethical to add or remove an author once you have submitted your manuscript. Any changes to authorship should be made only with the approval of all the co-authors.

What will you do if your article is rejected by the magazine describe the process?

1. Take Your Pulse.
2. Reading the Rejection Letter.
3. Following the Author Instructions.
4. Matching Paper to Journal.
5. Obtaining Additional Data or Reanalyzing Existing Data.
6. Resubmitting to the Same Journal.
7. Resubmitting to a New Journal.
8. Bottom Line.

When should you publish a correction?

Publisher Correction: A Publisher Correction may be published to correct an important error(s) made by the journal that affects the scientific integrity of the published article, the publication record, or the reputation of the authors or of the journal.

What should an author do if they realize there is an error?

If you detect an error in your published article (including an online first article), the first step is to inform the editor and publisher of the journal of the error. The editor and publisher will determine whether a formal correction notice is needed.

Can you resubmit a rejected manuscript?

The journal may reject your initial offering but invite you to resubmit later after addressing the reviewers’ concerns. Remember that some journals will inform you that they are not interested in accepting any future versions of the manuscript; you should respect this decision and try a different journal.

Can I submit a rejected article to another journal?

If your article is rejected the first time you send it to a journal, you should definitely send it to a second journal. About 85 percent of scholars now send their rejected articles to another journal. If three or more journals have rejected the article, it may be time to think about giving up on it.

What are the common mistakes that authors commit while writing a research article?

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Research Paper

1. Lack of research before choosing a thesis statement.
2. Lack of a strong thesis statement.
3. Failure to make appropriate connections between the thesis statement and supporting statements.
4. Lack of strong, relevant data to support statements.

How do I get my research paper approved?

Here are a few steps that you can take to significantly improve your chances of getting published:

1. Browse legit journals. As of 2015, the academic publishing market had an annual revenue of $20.5 Billion.
2. Choose the best-fit journal.
3. Understand the submission process.
4. Write a convincing journal cover letter.

How to respond to an error in a published paper?

In essence, two parties must respond to an error in a published paper: the author (s) and journal editors. Let’s start with journal editors. The assessments can be made on a case-by-case basis. For example, following can be considered by editors faced with a mistake in a published paper: What is the nature of the correction request?

How do you deal with reviewers who criticize your paper?

And for you as the author, that hurts. When you see the criticisms that the reviewers have about your paper, go ahead and get mad. Go ahead and vent your frustration to a colleague. Then get over it before you take any future action to revise your paper and respond to the reviewers. Poor judgment at this point will produce a poor outcome.

Should you respond to reviews of your research paper?

Responding to reviewers can seem like a chore, as nobody likes their work to be criticized. But if you see the reviewers’ comments as an opportunity to improve your research paper and get credit for it, responding to reviews will feel less burdensome.

What arguments should you never use when responding to reviewers?

One argument you should never use when responding to reviewers is that only one reviewer took issue with an aspect of the paper whereas the other reviewer saw nothing wrong with it. Reviewers are often selected because they have different areas of expertise and will look at a paper from 2 different points of view.