Who controlled the Middle East?

the Ottoman Empire
The Middle East was largely controlled by the Ottoman Empire before World War One — a dominance that had prevailed for half a millennium.

What countries have never been to war?

The only, and never fought a war, never faced a war. San Marino! San Marino was an interesting case because she was founded at 4th century CE. The foundation of San Marino, one of the oldest-existing nations in the world, has never been involved in any wars at all.

Is the Middle East safe?

For some reason, crime in the Middle East is barely existent. You may find some little petty crime in a few capitals like Amman (Jordan) and Cairo (Egypt) but that’s because they are the most touristic capitals in the region and, in any case, it’s nothing particularly disturbing.

What happens if America goes home from the Middle East?

If America goes home from the Middle East, it will sooner or later face pressures to go big. Whatever policies the Trump administration pursues in the Middle East, then, the United States will continue to face the same conflicting imperatives that have long shaped its approach to that region.

Can America disengage from the Middle East without consequences?

Second, however, it is a fantasy to think that the United States can disengage from the Middle East without consequence. This is because America still has pressing interests in that region—and because those interests are as unlikely to protect themselves today as they ever have been in the past.

Would better borders have spared the Middle East a century’s worth of violence?

The idea that better borders, drawn with careful attention to the region’s ethnic and religious diversity, would have spared the Middle East a century’s worth of violence is especially provocative at a moment when Western powers weigh the merits of intervention in the region.

Should the United States get more involved in the Middle East?

Getting deeply involved in the Middle East ran the risk of making America the target of that radicalism and anger; it also ran the risk of distracting the United States from other areas where the prospects for constructive change seemed more promising.