Which sorting algorithm can be best fitted for linked list?
Table of Contents
- 1 Which sorting algorithm can be best fitted for linked list?
- 2 Which of the following sorting algorithms can be used to sort a linked list with best time complexity?
- 3 What are linked lists not suitable for?
- 4 Which sorting algorithm is best and why?
- 5 How to sort a linked list with a lower growth function?
Which sorting algorithm can be best fitted for linked list?
Why is Merge Sort preferred for Linked Lists?
- In case of linked lists the case is different mainly due to difference in memory allocation of arrays and linked lists.
- Unlike array, in linked list, we can insert items in the middle in O(1) extra space and O(1) time if we are given reference/pointer to the previous node.
Which sorting algorithm is not suitable for linked list?
The slow random-access performance of a linked list makes other algorithms (such as quicksort) perform poorly, and others (such as heapsort) completely impossible.
Which sorting algorithm is best for sorted list?
Analysis of sorting techniques :
- When the array is almost sorted, insertion sort can be preferred.
- When order of input is not known, merge sort is preferred as it has worst case time complexity of nlogn and it is stable as well.
Which of the following sorting algorithms can be used to sort a linked list with best time complexity?
Merge Sort
Since worst case time complexity of Merge Sort is O(nLogn) and Insertion sort is O(n^2), merge sort is preferred.
Which sorting algorithms work as well on linked lists as on arrays?
Bubble sort works fine. For a doubly linked list, both performs well.
Why linked lists are not suitable for binary search?
The main problem that binary search takes O(n) time in Linked List due to fact that in linked list we are not able to do indexing which led traversing of each element in Linked list take O(n) time. In this paper a method is implemented through which binary search can be done with time complexity of O(log2n).
What are linked lists not suitable for?
insertion sort. Binary search.
Which of the following sorting algorithm can be used to sort a linked list with best time complexity?
Discussion Forum
| Que. | Which of the following sorting algorithms can be used to sort a random linked list with minimum time complexity? |
|---|---|
| b. | Quick Sort |
| c. | Heap Sort |
| d. | Merge Sort |
| Answer:Merge Sort |
Which of the following sorting algorithms can be used to sort a random linked list with minimum time complexity insertion sort?
Data Structures | Linked List | Question 4. Which of the following sorting algorithms can be used to sort a random linked list with minimum time complexity? Explanation: Both Merge sort and Insertion sort can be used for linked lists.
Which sorting algorithm is best and why?
Time Complexities of Sorting Algorithms:
| Algorithm | Best | Worst |
|---|---|---|
| Bubble Sort | Ω(n) | O(n^2) |
| Merge Sort | Ω(n log(n)) | O(n log(n)) |
| Insertion Sort | Ω(n) | O(n^2) |
| Selection Sort | Ω(n^2) | O(n^2) |
What are some good sorting algorithms for linked lists?
For example, gnome sort, insertion sort and merge sort would be good candidates. That’s because random access to an element by index in linked list is slow, and linked lists are geared towards processing adjacent elements. P.S. I assume that sorting algorithm is not allowed to allocate temporary array for storage and must sort the list in place.
What is a sorting algorithm?
Last Updated : 29 Nov, 2018 A Sorting Algorithm is used to rearrange a given array or list elements according to a comparison operator on the elements. The comparison operator is used to decide the new order of element in the respective data structure. For example: The below list of characters is sorted in increasing order of their ASCII values.
How to sort a linked list with a lower growth function?
The special data algorithms such as radix sort (limits size of data) or histogram sort (counts discrete data) could sort a linked list with a lower growth function, as long as you use a different structure with O (1) access as temporary storage.
Is there a better algorithm than O(n ln n) n?
No known algorithms for sorting general data are better than O ( n ln n ). The special data algorithms such as radix sort ( limits size of data ) or histogram sort ( counts discrete data ) could sort a linked list with a lower growth function, as long as you use a different structure with O (1) access as temporary storage.