Tips and tricks

Where did too many chiefs not enough Indians come from?

Where did too many chiefs not enough Indians come from?

Too many bosses and not enough workers. This expression, also stated more hyperbolically as all chiefs and no Indians, originated in the first half of the 1900s. Although the term refers to native American tribal organization, it is not considered offensive.

What does it mean too many chiefs and not enough Indians?

phrase​informal. DEFINITIONS1. used for saying that there are too many people in charge of something and not enough people doing the work. Synonyms and related words.

READ ALSO:   Did Orell like Ygritte?

What is the saying too many chiefs?

phrase. Used to describe a situation where there are too many people giving orders and not enough people to carry them out. ‘I blame the managers – there are too many chiefs and not enough Indians. ‘

What does Chief and Indian mean?

Indian chief – the leader of a group of Native Americans. Indian chieftain. tribal chief, chieftain, headman, chief – the head of a tribe or clan.

What is the saying about too many chiefs?

What does an Indian chief mean?

1. Indian chief – the leader of a group of Native Americans. Indian chieftain. tribal chief, chieftain, headman, chief – the head of a tribe or clan. sagamore, sachem – a chief of a North American tribe or confederation (especially an Algonquian chief)

Is Chief an Indigenous word?

The word “chief” is not an inherently Indigenous word. It derives from the French word “chef,” which means a leader or commander. It was used by Shakespeare long before it was applied to the original inhabitants of the Americas.

READ ALSO:   What are the innovative ideas for rural development in india?

Is chief a Native American word?

Definition: Chief (n.) Namely that “chief” is a European title. As explained in the definition above, the term was applied to American Indians. It is not an Indigenous word.

Where does the phrase too many chiefs and not enough Indians come from?

Of American-English origin, the phrase too many chiefs and not enough Indians, also all chiefs and no Indians, is used of a situation in which there are too many people giving orders and not enough to carry them out. The earliest instances that I have found indicate that this phrase was first used in 1947 to characterise the situation of the U.S.

What does too many bosses and not enough Indians mean?

used to describe a situation where there are too many people giving orders and not enough people to carry them out. too many chiefs and not enough Indians. Too many bosses and not enough workers. This expression, also stated more hyperbolically as all chiefs and no Indians, originated in the first half of the 1900s.

READ ALSO:   What do you say in an exit interview for a bad manager?

Is there too many chiefs in an organization?

too many chiefs. If there are too many chiefs or too many chiefs and not enough Indians in an organization, there are too many people in charge and not enough people doing the work. This bank has 21 executive directors. No surprise, then, that some insiders say there are too many chiefs.

Did Janice Slaby write “cut chiefs not Indians”?

On May 29, 2009, Janice A. Slaby wrote a Letter to the Editor of the Los Angeles Daily News entitled, “Cut chiefs, not Indians.” The letter referred to a recently published article that dealt with debt problems in the state of California.