What is the difference between moral nihilism and moral relativism?

Moral relativism says that the truth values of moral statements are relative to something – maybe relative to the speaker, or the time period, or cultures, or whatever. Moral nihilism says that nothing is moral or immoral – morality does not exist. Moral statements are thus either all false or all nonsensical.

What is the difference between nihilism and relativism?

Nihilism is a denial of the entire realm of ethical reality. If you are a nihilist, moral conversation, moral arguments, have no point. They are absurd. A cultural relativist does believe (or ought to believe, if they are truly a cultural relativist) that a person can be morally mistaken.

What is the relationship between ethical relativism and moral nihilism?

Why are moral nihilism and ethical relativism? Because moral nihilism denies that there are any moral features/facts and ethical relativism believes that morality is a human creation.

How does moral nihilism differ from cultural relativism quizlet?

How does moral nihilism differ from cultural relativism? While cultural relativism claims that morality is relative to culture, moral nihilism claims that nothing can be morally wrong. Individual Subjectivism is the position that morality is subjective, in the sense that it is unique to each individual culture.

What is the difference between moral relativism and moral absolutism?

According to moral relativism, two people from different situations could disagree on whether an action is right or wrong, and they would both be right. Moral absolutism is the opposite. It argues that there are universal moral truths relevant across all contexts and all people.

What are the two forms of moral nihilism?

There are two important forms of moral nihilism: Error theory and Expressivism p. 292.

Which philosopher is most closely associated with moral nihilism in the textbook?

Among philosophers, Friedrich Nietzsche is most often associated with nihilism.