What does unacceptable paraphrasing mean?
Table of Contents
What does unacceptable paraphrasing mean?
This means: Don’t use the original sentence structure. Don’t simply substitute a few words here and there. Avoid using any of the author’s key words or unusual words. Disciplines vary in the amount of the original language that you are permitted to use without quotation; check with your professor.
What is acceptable unacceptable paraphrasing?
When you summarize or paraphrase, it is not enough to name the source; you must restate the source’s meaning in your own language” (p. The second is an unacceptable paraphrase. The third is an acceptable paraphrase.
What is acceptable paraphrasing?
For a paraphrase to be acceptable, you need to be able to answer yes to the following: The meaning is the same. Most of the words have been changed. The sentences have been significantly restructured. The information is referenced.
Why is paraphrasing wrong?
Incorrect paraphrasing is another way plagiarism can be present in an author’s writing. Two common characteristics of incorrect paraphrasing includes when the paraphrased version: Has the same sentence structure as the original and. Has key words from the original that the author simply rearranged or replaced.
Is paraphrasing good or bad?
Paraphrasing or using more than a few direction quotations interferes with the “flow” of your own writing. Thus, in psychological writing, paraphrasing is considered bad writing practice. For similar reasons, using more than a few direct quotes is also considered bad writing practice.
What does not paraphrase mean?
It means taking the words of another source and restating them, using your own vocabulary. In this way, you keep the meaning of the original text, but do not copy its exact wording. Original.
What is paraphrasing and its purpose?
The purpose of a paraphrase is to convey the meaning of the original message and, in doing so, to prove that you understand the passage well enough to restate it. The paraphrase should give the reader an accurate understanding of the author’s position on the topic.