Articles

What are the good things about colonialism?

What are the good things about colonialism?

Most of the thousands of studies on the topic find that while colonial rule brought some improvements in economic growth and long-term health and well-being, many of the post-colonial world’s economic and political difficulties (including corruption, poor economic productivity and violence) are directly linked to …

What were the negative of colonial rule for Africans?

Negative effects The Africans lost their political independence. Some traditional political institutions were destroyed and replaced with foreign ones. Foreign culture was imposed on Africans without regard for their own culture. This led to the loss of the African culture.

What is Gilley’s argument against colonialism?

Gilley’s argument is, roughly: opposition to colonialism is reflexive rather than reasoned. This has caused terrible consequences, because postcolonial governments have hurt their people by attempting to destroy beneficial colonial institutions. The “civilizing mission” of colonialism was valuable and had a positive effect.

READ ALSO:   Is it easy to fire someone in Canada?

What are the pros and cons of colonialism?

Nations suffered at the hands of their colonizers, while they still relied on these colonial masters for their economic needs. Despite the many disadvantages, colonialism still brought in some significant benefits. Pros of Colonialism. 1. Colonialism Improved Health and Care System

Is there a case for colonialism in academics?

Being pro-colonial is no bar to success in academia; Harvard historian Niall Ferguson has long defended the British Empire as a force for good in the world. And now, Princeton PhD and Portland State University professor Bruce Gilley has published an unapologetic “Case for Colonialism” in Third World Quarterly, a respected academic journal.

Should anti-colonialism be abandoned?

Anti-colonialism is a destructive and irrational “ideology” that should be abandoned. I suppose to those unfamiliar with the history, Gilley’s argument could appear superficially persuasive. But a moment’s examination of the record reveals why the case he makes is abhorrent.