Q&A

What are the disadvantages of British rule in India?

What are the disadvantages of British rule in India?

They suffered poverty, malnutrition, disease, cultural upheaval, economic exploitation, political disadvantage, and systematic programmes aimed at creating a sense of social and racial inferiority.

Why were the Indian against the British rule?

One reason why the British were reluctant to leave India was that they feared India would erupt into civil war between Muslims and Hindus. The country was deeply divided along religious lines. In 1946-47, as independence grew closer, tensions turned into terrible violence between Muslims and Hindus.

READ ALSO:   What are the lines on the trachea called?

What were the effects of British rule?

Effect: Many American colonists feared a powerful government. Cause: Many former colonists feared losing their freedom to a new government. Effect: The new Americans made sure their new government could not take away states’ freedom and independence. Cause: The British government taxed the American colonists unfairly.

What might have forced the British to leave India?

An early symptom of the weakness of the empire was Britain’s withdrawal from India in 1947. During World War Two, the British had mobilised India’s resources for their imperial war effort. They crushed the attempt of Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress to force them to ‘quit India’ in 1942.

How did India react to British rule?

In India the British rule was first established in Bengal and it was in Bengal that reaction against the British first began. He would not tolerate the English merchants’ ruining the Indian merchants by cheating the government of internal tariff. He drew the attention of the Calcutta Council, but to no purpose.

READ ALSO:   What does it mean if someone calls you smooth?

What are the positive impact of British rule in India?

Positive Impact: Some positive impact of the British rule in India were the introduction of the railways, post and telegraph system for masses, introduction of Western sceinces and the English language. However, it is to be noted that the British intorduced railways for its own benifits.

What is the British view on the British rule in India?

The British view tended to portray British rule as a charitable exercise – they suffered India’s environment (eg climate, diseases) in order to bring to India good government and economic development (eg railways, irrigation, medicine).

What would have happened to India without the British Empire?

Without British rule, the nation of India may not even exist today. India was an essential part of the British empire. This fact granted them protection against their traditional enemies like Persia, Afghanistan, and other western countries like France that would jump at the chance to take over. British rule was a deterrent to outside aggressors.

READ ALSO:   How do you know if you have PTSD after a car accident?

How did the British protect India from foreign enemies?

Protection from external enemies: India was known as the “jewel in the crown of the British Empire”. Thus the British provided protection against like Persia and Afghanistan. Even other western nations like France were deterred from being too involved with India.

How effective were the British in infiltrating the Indian states?

The British were very effective at infiltrating these states and gradually taking control. They often left the local princes in charge of the various parts of India. These local princes were effective at maintaining British rule and gained much from being loyal to the British.