Were the soldiers in the Boston Massacre justified?

The soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre were proven innocent. In a today’s court system I believe them British soldiers would have been guilty and been convicted with murder. “Adams said, the killing were justified and blamed the violence of the immigrant Patrick Carr and Crispus Attucks”.

How were the soldiers treated in the Boston Massacre?

Eight soldiers were next brought to trial and six were acquitted. The remaining two soldiers were found guilty of MANSLAUGHTER (as opposed to murder). The method of punishment was branding on the thumb. The two soldiers, Matthew Killroy and Hugh Montgomery, received their penalty and were discharged from the military.

What was good about the Boston Massacre?

The event in Boston helped to unite the colonies against Britain. What started as a minor fight became a turning point in the beginnings of the American Revolution. The Boston Massacre helped spark the colonists’ desire for American independence, while the dead rioters became martyrs for liberty.

Why are the British soldiers to blame for the Boston Massacre?

It happened near the courthouse in front of the church on a street called King Street. British soldiers had shot at a group of colonists killing 5 of them. A reason why the Boston Massacre was the fault of the British is because they killed the colonists by firing their weapons in the crowd of 30-40 colonists.

Do you think the colonial outrage over the Boston Massacre was justified?

Explanation: The outrage that occurred over the Boston Massacre was not justified, in my opinion. This is because there was evidence pointing to the fact that the soldiers were provoked to fire and were being harassed by the colonists.

What is the Boston Massacre summary?

The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot” mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed and this led to a campaign by speech-writers to rouse the ire of the citizenry.

What helped lead to the Boston Massacre quizlet?

The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770 in Boston, Massachusetts on King Street. It started as a fight between the colonists and British soldiers. The colonists were angry over the Townshend Acts, which led to riots. Five colonists died in this fight.

What happened right after the Boston Massacre?

Over the next five years, the colonists continued their rebellion and staged the Boston Tea Party, formed the First Continental Congress and defended their militia arsenal at Concord against the redcoats, effectively launching the American Revolution.

What did the British think about the Boston Massacre?

Patriots argued the event was the massacre of civilians perpetrated by the British Army, while loyalists argued that it was an unfortunate accident, the result of self-defense of the British soldiers from a threatening and dangerous mob.

Who started the Boston Massacre and why?

The Boston Massacre began the evening of March 5, 1770 with a small argument between British Private Hugh White and a few colonists outside the Custom House in Boston on King Street. The argument began to escalate as more colonists gathered and began to harass and throw sticks and snowballs at Private White.

How did colonists feel about the Boston Massacre?

The Boston Massacre had a major impact on relations between Britain and the American colonists. It further incensed colonists already weary of British rule and unfair taxation and roused them to fight for independence. Yet perhaps Preston said it best when he wrote about the conflict and said, “None of them was a hero.

What was the social impact of the Boston Massacre?

Answer and Explanation: The Boston Massacre’s social impact was widespread and swift: it resulted in a significant backlash against British troops and colonial rule from Britain but also resulted in division within Boston among Patriots and Loyalists.