Is Halliday and Resnick good?

Resnick & Halliday is not a suitable book for the all types of students and all types exams. It is a very good book to learn the subject, suggested for toppers or who loves physics.

Which is better fundamentals of physics or principles of physics?

The original book was named Fundamentals of Physics . The latest edition (9th edition onwards) was published internationally as Principles of Physics. So in America it is still called Fundamentals of Physics. Therefore, theory wise, there is no difference between them.

Is Halliday Resnick good for self study?

Halliday and Resnick is good if you’re looking to understand the subject as a fresher and looking to solve problems at the same time.

Is Resnick Halliday good for NEET Quora?

Overall, I’d say that if you’re a star performer in physics and can devote some extra time to it in order to develop upon your logical basis, the book is highly recommended for you.

When did Halliday and Resnick’s first edition come out?

The first edition by Halliday & Resnick (no Krane or Walker) came out in 1960. It came in one volume, it had no “Extended” section, no color, no USA Today look and no more than 20 problems at the end of each chapter. The physics though was the same.

What is the relation between Kuruman and Halliday/Resnick physics?

Halliday/Resnick/Krane is the direct “descendant” of the original Halliday/Resnick “Physics” that kuruman describes. Halliday and Resnick later developed a slimmed-down version, “Fundamentals of Physics”, which became more popular than the original book.

Is there any real-world physics in fundamentals of Physics?

I have packed a lot of real-world physics into Fundamentals of Physics, con- necting it with the new edition of The Flying Circus of Physics. Much of the mate- rial comes from the introductory physics classes I teach, where I can judge from the faces and blunt comments what material and presentations work and what do not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaM1wM_IWKg