Is China a socialist or capitalist state?
Table of Contents
The Communist Party of China maintains that despite the co-existence of private capitalists and entrepreneurs with public and collective enterprise, China is not a capitalist country because the party retains control over the direction of the country, maintaining its course of socialist development.
China’s “socialist market economy”, which mixes public ownership and state guidance with aspects of the market, has propelled the nation from an economic backwater into the global engine of growth in about four decades.
Are Western European “socialism” and China in a transition to post-capitalism?
Western European “socialisms” (Scandinavia, Germany, Italy, etc) would thus also, like China, fall somewhere in the blocked transition from capitalism to post-capitalism. Despite Europe’s different politics and multiple-party system, most of its parties accept and reinforce a commitment to a kind of state capitalism.
Is state capitalism the end of socialism?
The state capitalism originally conceived as a transitional stage en route to a socialism different from and beyond state capitalism came instead to define socialism. The transition had become the end.* The “different from and beyond” faded into a vague goal located in a distant future.
Is China’s transition to a post- capitalist society stalled?
Yet China today, like the USSR a century ago, faces the same transition problem: Transition to a post-capitalist society has been stalled. In China since at least the 1970s, the Communist Party and the government it controls have managed state-owned and -supervised private enterprises.
How does China’s economic system differ from Western capitalism?
In private enterprises, the employers are private citizens; they occupy no position within the state apparatus. China’s economic system differs sharply from a Western capitalist system. First, it has a larger sector of state-owned and -operated enterprises than what Western capitalisms display.