How were Hobbes and Locke similar and different?

Hobbes was a proponent of Absolutism, a system which placed control of the state in the hands of a single individual, a monarch free from all forms of limitations or accountability. Locke, on the other hand, favored a more open approach to state-building.

What did Hobbes and Locke agree on?

In 1690, Locke published his Two Treatises of Government. He generally agreed with Hobbes about the brutality of the state of nature, which required a social contract to assure peace.

What is the difference between Hobbes and Locke social contract?

(1) Hobbes’ sovereign is not a party to any contract and has no obligation to protect his citizens’ natural rights. (2) Locke has two contracts (between citizens and citizens, and between citizens and the government) in place of Hobbes’ single contract (between citizens to obey the sovereign).

What is Locke’s notion of a social contract compare with that of Hobbes?

Hobbes theory of Social Contract supports absolute sovereign without giving any value to individuals, while Locke and Rousseau supports individual than the state or the government.

How do Locke and Hobbes explain the formation of the social contract among citizens and a sovereign?

Hobbes and Locke argued that the state had arisen out of a voluntary agreement, or social contract, made by individuals who recognised that only the establishment of sovereign power could safeguard them from the insecurity of the state of nature.

What is the difference between the social contracts of Hobbes and Locke?

What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?

Locke and Hobbes both share a vision of the social contract as instrumental in a state’s political stability. However, their respective philosophies were informed by a starkly contrasting vision of human nature.