How do I disagree with a reviewer?

It is absolutely fine to disagree with a reviewer’s comment. You can send a point-by-point response to the editor explaining why you disagree with the reviewer’s suggestion. Make sure your response is backed by supporting evidence. If your viewpoint is justified, the editor will definitely consider it.

How do you respond to reviewers?

Responding to reviewers’ comments

1. Begin by thanking the reviewer for taking the time to assess your manuscript.
2. Then, specify that you’ve addressed all the concerns they raised.
3. List all the reviewer’s comments and your answer to each one.
4. Avoid giving yes or no answers.

How do you respond to reviewer comments the calm way?

Your responses should be polite and objective, balancing the line between being concise and complete. There is no space for ego in your response. Start by thanking the reviewers for identifying the weaknesses in your paper and providing you the opportunity to strengthen your research prior to publication.

What responsibility do you think reviewers have to the subjects they are reviewing or to their readers?

Reviewers are responsible for acting promptly, adhering to the instructions for completing a review, and submitting it in a timely manner. Failure to do so undermines the review process. Every effort should be made to complete the review within the time requested.

How do you argue with a reviewer?

Be polite, give proper argument to explain why you differ with reviewer comment, and let the editor decide. Be polite and make strong arguments.

How do you decline a revision?

Revise your submission and explain why you didn’t revise certain reviewers’ comments. Describe in the cover letter and/or the ‘Response to reviewers’ document what you changed or didn’t change and why. Withdraw your manuscript. Contest the editor decision.

How do you respond to a major revision?

Revising and responding

1. Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments.
2. Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers.
3. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised.

How do you acknowledge anonymous reviewers?

However, if a reviewer provided feedback that adds something to a paper that was not originally thought of by the author, they could well thank her anonymously in the acknowledgements, specifying the original contribution that was made by the reviewer. Like you would/should credit all essential external contributions.

How should I respond if I Cannot address a reviewer’s suggestion?

Answer: I think you should just be honest and mention to the editor that while you agree with the reviewer’s suggestion, you had not thought of this at the time of the experiment, and therefore, had not taken a picture.

What are the roles and responsibilities of a reviewer?

They provide feedback on the paper, suggest improvements and make a recommendation to the editor about whether to accept, reject or request changes to the article. The ultimate decision always rests with the editor but reviewers play a significant role in determining the outcome.

What is the ethical responsibility of a reviewer?

These responsibilities include the unbiased selection of reviewers, the assurance to the author that the peer review process will be done in a fair and timely fashion, and that the final decision regarding acceptance or publication will be based on the scientific validity of the information in the manuscript.

How to make an impact as a proposal reviewer?

10 Ways to Make an Impact as a Proposal Reviewer. 1 1. Thoroughly Read the RFP. 2 2. Understand the Customer. 3 3. Segment Your Review. 4 4. Skim, Then Review. 5 5. Continually Reference the RFP.

Does your proposal color team review impact the chances of winning?

Done properly, a proposal color team review can make a big impact on the chances of winning. As a proposal reviewer, your support and input are critical! This post was written by Meghan Slipka, senior consultant at Red Team Consulting.

What are the most common mistakes in writing a proposal?

A common mistake in proposals is that the requirement has been answered, just in the wrong section. To avoid wasting time commenting on certain areas, then revising those comments, skim the entire section to get a general assessment, then go back and conduct a thorough review. 5. Continually Reference the RFP

Is the grant review system corrupt and unfair?

At the same time, the third reviewers serve as the primary and/or secondary reviewers for grants where they have expertise and tend to appreciate those grants. Yes, indeed the review system is not only totally unfair but corrupted. I have had the same experience and worst.