Articles

How did Aristotle define emotions?

How did Aristotle define emotions?

In his theory, to have an emotion is to experience pain, pleasure or both, where this pain or pleasure is intentional and representational. An emotion is pain or pleasure at the emotion’s object, where that object is represented in ways that give grounds for the particular emotion experienced.

What did Aristotle say about feelings?

1. Aristotle. Aristotle’s preferred term for the emotions was pathos [pl. pathē], which makes the emotions largely passive states, located within a general metaphysical landscape contrasting active and passive, form and matter, and actuality and potentiality.

Can you have feelings without emotions?

Alexithymia is a broad term to describe problems with feeling emotions. In fact, this Greek term used in Freudian psychodynamic theories loosely translates to “no words for emotion.” While the condition is not well-known, it’s estimated that 1 in 10 people has it.

READ ALSO:   What is the new currency in PUBG?

Can you make a decision without emotion?

But in any successful company, emotions have no place in the decision-making process. Decisions, no matter how small or large, must be made solely on factual data and without any bias or emotions. One cannot rely on emotion or instinct in the decision-making process.

What is the value of the study of Philosophy?

If the study of philosophy has any value at all for others than students of philosophy, it must be only indirectly, through its effects upon the lives of those who study it. It is in these effects, therefore, if anywhere, that the value of philosophy must be primarily sought.

What is the importance of logic in the field of Philosophy?

Among the many branches of Philosophy, Logic, however, is special or unique for it serves as the ‘language’ of Philosophy. By this, we mean that any other branch of Philosophy, say Ethics, uses the principles of Logic in analyzing and presenting the theories under that field.

READ ALSO:   Who is Lucifer brother in DC?

Are there any substantive differences between analytic and continental philosophy?

Because of such developments, Leiter has argued that there are no longer substantive philosophical differences between analytic and continental philosophy, although there are sometimes important differences of “style.”

Why is Ethics considered the most accessible branch of Philosophy?

Preliminaries If ethics is widely regarded as the most accessible branch of philosophy, it is so because many of its presuppositions are self-evident or trivial truths: All human actions, for example, serve some end or purpose; whether they are right or wrong depends on an actor’s overall aims.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzJcy6ZuZwI